734-936-8000 - Service Desk | Request Support

Prenatal Care Redesign: Creating Flexible Maternity Care Models Through Virtual Care

To begin this activity, click Enroll. Once logged in, learners can access educational content, assessments, and evaluations. Learners who successfully complete the activity will be able to print a certificate.

Step Status
Educational Materials
Evaluation
Release Date: Mon, 5/11/20
Termination Date: Thu, 12/31/20
Credits: 0.25
Description:

Prenatal Care Redesign: Creating Flexible Maternity

Presenters: Alex Peahl, MD MSc; Michelle Moniz, MD MSc; Roger Smith, MD

There are no relevant financial relationships to disclose for this activity.
Educational Objectives:

After completing this activity participants will be able to improve

  • Management of the public health crisis
  • Teamwork
  • Communication
  • Patient care
  • Target Audience:

    Access to content is limited to Michigan Medicine or those with a level 1 sign-on.

    This activity is appropriate for:
    Physicians, Physician Assistants, Nurse Practitioners, Nurses, and Other Healthcare Professionals

    In the fields of:
    Obstetrics & Gynecology

    Accreditation Information:

    The University of Michigan Medical School is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians.

    The University of Michigan Medical School designates this enduring material for a maximum of 0.25 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

    Original Release Date: May 2020
    Termination Date: December 2020

    Additional Info:
    1. Butler TobahYS, LeBlanc A, Branda ME, InselmanJW, Morris MA, Ridgeway JL, et al. Randomized comparison of a reduced visit prenatal care model enhanced with remote monitoring. Am J ObstetGynecol2019;221:638.e1–8.
    2. Children's Bureau. Prenatal Care. The United States Department of Labor, 1930.
    3. DowswellT, CarroliG, DuleyL, Gates S, GülmezogluAM, Khan-NeelofurD, et al. Alternative versus standard packages of antenatal care for low-risk pregnancy. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 7. Art. No.: CD000934. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000934.pub3.
    4. Howell EA, Brown H, Brumley J, Bryant AS, CaugheyAB, Cornell AM, et al. Reduction of peripartum racial and ethnic disparities: a conceptual framework and maternal safety consensus bundle. ObstetGynecol2018;131:770–82.
    5. Kilpatrick SJ, PapileL-A, MaconesGA, editors. Guidelines for perinatal care. 8th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL/Washington, DC: American Academy of Pediatrics/The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2017.
    6. Osterman MJK, Martin JA. Timing and adequacy of prenatal care in the United States, 2016. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2018;67:1–14.
    7. Peahl AF, Heisler M, EssenmacherLK, Dalton VK, Chopra V, AdmonLK, et al. A comparison of international prenatal care guidelines for low-risk women to inform high-value care. Am J
    8. ObstetGynecol2020
    9. Peahl AF, Novara A, Heisler M, Dalton VK, Moniz MH, Smith RD. Patient preferences for prenatal and postpartum care delivery: a survey of postpartum women. ObstetGynecol2020;135: 1038–46.
    10. Peahl AF, GourevitchR, Luo E, Fryer K, Moniz M, Dalton V, FendrickAM, Shah N. Right-sizing prenatal care to meet patients' need and improve maternity care value. ObstetGynecol2020; 135 1026-1037.
    11. Petersen EE, Davis NL, Goodman D, Cox S, SyversonC, Seed K, et al. Racial/ethnic disparities in pregnancy-related deaths—United States, 2007–2016. MMWR MorbMortal WklyRep 2019;68:762–5.

    Credits available:

    AMA PRA Category 1: 0.25
    Participation: 0.25